This research monitored the effectiveness of a wildlife mitigation project on SH 9 in Grand County Colorado. The purpose of the mitigation was to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions while providing permeability for wildlife across the highway. was designed to improve driver safety while allowing for wildlife movement across the road. This study uses motion-activated cameras and WVC crash and carcass data to determine how successful the mitigation measures are., report to the Colorado Department of Transportation, Applied Research and Innovation Branch ; prepared by Julia Kintsch, Patricia Cramer, Paige Singer, and Michelle Cowardin., Research brief -- Final report -- Literature review., "March 2020.", Includes bibliographical references (pages C-3 to C-5), Report number CDOT-2021-01., Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed May 2021)
This research evaluates the effectiveness of the SH 9 Colorado River South Wildlife & Safety Improvement Project, including two wildlife overpasses, and five wildlife underpasses connected with 10.4 miles of wildlife exclusion fencing in Grand County, CO. The project was designed to improve driver safety while allowing for wildlife movement across the road. This study uses motion-activated cameras and WVC crash and carcass data to determine how successful the mitigation measures are. In addition to the crossing structures, deer guards, escape ramps, pedestrian walk-through gates and the fence end are being monitored., Julia Kintsch, Patricia Cramer, and Paige Singer., "Feb 2017.", Includes bibliographic references (pages 36-37), Report No. CDOT-2017-04, Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed August 2019)
This research evaluates the effectiveness of the SH 9 Colorado River South Wildlife & Safety Improvement Project, including two wildlife overpasses, and five wildlife underpasses connected with 10.4 miles of wildlife exclusion fencing in Grand County, CO. The project was designed to improve driver safety while allowing for wildlife movement across the road. This study uses motion-activated cameras and WVC crash and carcass data to determine how successful the mitigation measures are. In addition to the crossing structures, deer guards, escape ramps, pedestrian walk-through gates and the fence end are being monitored., report to the Colorado Department of Transportation, Applied Research and Innovation Branch ; prepared by Julia Kintsch, Patricia Cramer, Paige Singer, Michelle Cowardin, Joy Phelan., "March 2018.", Report numbering from website., Includes bibliographical references (pages 66-67), Report No. 2018-06, Study Number 115.01, Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed October 2019)
This research evaluates the effectiveness of the SH 9 Colorado River South Wildlife & Safety Improvement Project, including two wildlife overpasses, and five wildlife underpasses connected with 10.4 miles of wildlife exclusion fencing in Grand County, CO. The project was designed to improve driver safety while allowing for wildlife movement across the road. This study uses motion-activated cameras and WVC crash and carcass data to determine how successful the mitigation measures are. In addition to the crossing structures, deer guards, escape ramps, pedestrian walk-through gates and the fence end are being monitored., report to the Colorado Department of Transportation, Applied Research and Innovation Branch ; prepared by Julia Kintsch, Patricia Cramer, Paige Singer, Michelle Cowardin, Joy Phelan., "April 2019.", Report number from website., Includes bibliographical references (pages 67-68), Report No. 19-02, Study Number 115.01, Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed October 2019)
This research evaluates the effectiveness of the SH 9 Colorado River South Wildlife & Safety Improvement Project, including two wildlife overpasses, and five wildlife underpasses connected with 10.4 miles of wildlife exclusion fencing in Grand County, CO. The project was designed to improve driver safety while allowing for wildlife movement across the road. This study uses motion-activated cameras and WVC crash and carcass data to determine how successful the mitigation measures are. In addition to the crossing structures, deer guards, escape ramps, pedestrian walk-through gates and the fence end are being monitored., report to the Colorado Department of Transportation, Applied Research and Innovation Branch ; prepared by Julia Kintsch, Patricia Cramer, Paige Singer, Michelle Cowardin, Joy Phelan., "March 2020.", Report number from website., Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed July 2020)
prepared for Colorado Department of Transportation, Region 1 ; prepared by AECOM., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed September 2013)
Due to concerns that the hydrologic regime of the wetland complex in and around Summit Lake Park has been significantly altered by development of State Highway 5 (SH 5), a field study of the hydrology, soils, and vegetation above and below the roadway was initiated in 2018. The objectives of this study are to investigate the natural hydrologic processes and vegetation up-gradient from SH 5, and how they may be impacted in down-gradient areas. A review and synthesis of the road design elements that mitigate the effects of freeze-thaw and permafrost degradation, as well as minimize hydrologic disruption to adjacent wetlands is also included., Jeremy R. Shaw, David J. Cooper., Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed September 2019), Interim report June 2018-June 2019., Report No. CDOT-2019-03
prepared for Colorado Department of Transportation, Region 1 ; prepared by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig in association with: Atkins North America, Inc., CDR Associates, ArLand Land Use Economics, Frank Miltenberger Landscape Architect., CDOT project no. STA 007A 012 (16725), FHU Reference No. 11-178-01., Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page; (viewed May 2014)
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
"Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332 (2) (c), 23 USC 128 (a) and 49 USC 303."--Signature page., "Cooperating agencies US Army Corps of Engineers [and] US Forest Service."--Signature page, FHWA-CO-EIS-02-01-F
