"This plan, the result of a partnership among the Departments of Transportation of Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, outlines a series of priorities and steps to improve the corridor and serves as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. Funding for this planning project was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Colorado Department of Transportation serving as project manager.", Study overview -- Table of contents and executive summary -- Chapter 1, Introduction -- Chapter 2, Development plan -- Chapter 3, Environmental considerations -- Chapter 4, Maintenance and operation plan -- Chapter 5, Benefit cost analysis -- Chapter 6, Finance plan -- Chapter 7, Risk assessment -- Public communications guide -- Appendix A -- Appendix B-1, Development plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-2, Environmental considerations, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-3, Maintenance & operation, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-4, Benefit cost, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-5, Finance plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-6, Risk assessment, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-7, Stakeholder involvement., Cover title.
"This plan, the result of a partnership among the Departments of Transportation of Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, outlines a series of priorities and steps to improve the corridor and serves as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. Funding for this planning project was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Colorado Department of Transportation serving as project manager.", Study overview -- Table of contents and executive summary -- Chapter 1, Introduction -- Chapter 2, Development plan -- Chapter 3, Environmental considerations -- Chapter 4, Maintenance and operation plan -- Chapter 5, Benefit cost analysis -- Chapter 6, Finance plan -- Chapter 7, Risk assessment -- Public communications guide -- Appendix A -- Appendix B-1, Development plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-2, Environmental considerations, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-3, Maintenance & operation, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-4, Benefit cost, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-5, Finance plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-6, Risk assessment, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-7, Stakeholder involvement., Cover title.
"This plan, the result of a partnership among the Departments of Transportation of Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, outlines a series of priorities and steps to improve the corridor and serves as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. Funding for this planning project was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Colorado Department of Transportation serving as project manager.", Study overview -- Table of contents and executive summary -- Chapter 1, Introduction -- Chapter 2, Development plan -- Chapter 3, Environmental considerations -- Chapter 4, Maintenance and operation plan -- Chapter 5, Benefit cost analysis -- Chapter 6, Finance plan -- Chapter 7, Risk assessment -- Public communications guide -- Appendix A -- Appendix B-1, Development plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-2, Environmental considerations, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-3, Maintenance & operation, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-4, Benefit cost, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-5, Finance plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-6, Risk assessment, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-7, Stakeholder involvement., Cover title.
"This plan, the result of a partnership among the Departments of Transportation of Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, outlines a series of priorities and steps to improve the corridor and serves as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. Funding for this planning project was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Colorado Department of Transportation serving as project manager.", Study overview -- Table of contents and executive summary -- Chapter 1, Introduction -- Chapter 2, Development plan -- Chapter 3, Environmental considerations -- Chapter 4, Maintenance and operation plan -- Chapter 5, Benefit cost analysis -- Chapter 6, Finance plan -- Chapter 7, Risk assessment -- Public communications guide -- Appendix A -- Appendix B-1, Development plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-2, Environmental considerations, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-3, Maintenance & operation, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-4, Benefit cost, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-5, Finance plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-6, Risk assessment, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-7, Stakeholder involvement., Cover title.
"This plan, the result of a partnership among the Departments of Transportation of Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, outlines a series of priorities and steps to improve the corridor and serves as a tool for securing funding for corridor development. Funding for this planning project was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation with the Colorado Department of Transportation serving as project manager.", Study overview -- Table of contents and executive summary -- Chapter 1, Introduction -- Chapter 2, Development plan -- Chapter 3, Environmental considerations -- Chapter 4, Maintenance and operation plan -- Chapter 5, Benefit cost analysis -- Chapter 6, Finance plan -- Chapter 7, Risk assessment -- Public communications guide -- Appendix A -- Appendix B-1, Development plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-2, Environmental considerations, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-3, Maintenance & operation, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-4, Benefit cost, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-5, Finance plan, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-6, Risk assessment, supporting technical analysis -- Appendix B-7, Stakeholder involvement., Cover title.
In December 2004, a Corridor Development and Management Plan (CDMP) for the Ports to Plains Corridor was completed. While the recommendations for the plan were far reaching and extensive, the need for improved truck parking and rest area deficiencies was given a limited analysis, resulting in generalized recommendations for improvements along the Corridor. The Ports to Plains Steering Committee initiated this study to provide an additional Public/Private rest area and truck parking needs assessment., submitted to Colorado Department of Transportation, New Mexico Department of Transportation, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Texas Department of Transportation ; submitted by DMJM Harris [and] AECOM., "February 2007.", Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed June 2016)
The objective of this project was to assess the efficacy of post-fire ground treatment in mitigating erosion and runoff on soil slopes subjected to wildfires. This objective was achieved through physical slope-model experiments and discrete element method (DEM) modeling. Model simulations indicated that an increase in the root network inhibited particles dislodgement and decreased downslope movement of particles., Christopher Bareither, Paul Heyliger, Kayla Moden, Kirsten Petterson., "August 2018.", Includes bibliographical references (pages 32-34), Report No. CDOT-2018-19, Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed September 2019)
The advent of solar energy utilization in highway infrastructure around the country has been increasing in recent years. Right of Ways (ROWs) have several advantages for energy development such as the existing electrical infrastructure aligned with the major highways, a secured boundary, and easy maintenance access. To understand the potential impacts on driver safety, environmental resources, and maintenance operations, case studies are presented from national and international projects. Factors associated risk impacts are analyzed qualitatively as well as quantitatively. Mitigation measures are recommended to minimize the undesirable impacts in the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of solar array., Ananda Paudel, Arthur Hirsch., "October 2015.", Prepared in cooperation with the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration., Bibliography: pages 46-48., Report No. CDOT-2015-08., Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed April 2016)
William M. Lewis., "December 2000.", Technical Report number: CDOT-DTD-R-2000-12., Includes bibliographical references (page 27)., Phase I final report., Performed by Western Environmental Analysts for the Federal Highway Administration., Print version record.
Crack sealants are often utilized as a preservation tool in asphalt pavements. When a hot mix asphalt overlay is placed on top a pavement containing crack sealants, a bump and additional transverse cracks sometimes occur in the new asphalt overlay. These bumps and sometimes, transverse cracks are initiated during breakdown rolling and become progressively more severe upon further compaction. This paper presents results of a five-year study designed to identify factors that relate to the appearance of these bumps and consequent cracks., Scott Shuler., "January 2017.", Prepared in cooperation with the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration., Includes bibliographical references pages 11-12., Report No. CDOT-2017-02., Online resource; title from PDF cover (viewed March 2017)
This document is written to help explain to motor carriers and others, their responsibilities regarding spills of petroleum fuel and other hazardous materials due to transportation incidents or crashes on state or federal highways within Colorado. This document is a compilation of state rules, statutes procedures, state and local contacts, and other information. This compilation is intended to help explain the requirements on reporting, permitting, remediating, and receiving “No Further Action” determinations on incidents involving spills in Colorado within a highway right-of-way., Online resource; title from PDF caption (viewed September 2016)
"July 2007.", "Submitted pursuant to 42 USC 4332(2)(c) by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and CDOT.", Mode of access: World Wide Web.
adopted by the Colorado Transportation Commission on September 16, 2009., "Adopted on 9/16/09." -- Footer., Online resource; title from PDF caption (viewed January 2018)
Colorado Department of Transportation, DMJM-HARRIS, HDR., "May 18, 2005.", "To evaluate and validate the Project, a Public Benefits & Costs Study (the Study) was completed by DMJM+HARRIS and HDR (the Consultant team), in conjunction with CDOT. The purpose of this Study is to identify, and in some cases quantify, the potential public and private benefits and costs of relocating through-freight train infrastructure (bypass), and detail the advantages and disadvantages of a public-private partnership project between CDOT, other public entities, and the BNSF and UP railroads."--P. 2., Includes bibliographical references., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover; (viewed August 2013), Project no. C SWOO-242.
Colorado Department of Transportation, DMJM-HARRIS, HDR., "May 18, 2005.", "To evaluate and validate the Project, a Public Benefits & Costs Study (the Study) was completed by DMJM+HARRIS and HDR (the Consultant team), in conjunction with CDOT. The purpose of this Study is to identify, and in some cases quantify, the potential public and private benefits and costs of relocating through-freight train infrastructure (bypass), and detail the advantages and disadvantages of a public-private partnership project between CDOT, other public entities, and the BNSF and UP railroads."--P. 2., Includes bibliographical references., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover; (viewed August 2013), Project no. C SWOO-242.
Colorado Department of Transportation, DMJM-HARRIS, HDR., "May 18, 2005.", "To evaluate and validate the Project, a Public Benefits & Costs Study (the Study) was completed by DMJM+HARRIS and HDR (the Consultant team), in conjunction with CDOT. The purpose of this Study is to identify, and in some cases quantify, the potential public and private benefits and costs of relocating through-freight train infrastructure (bypass), and detail the advantages and disadvantages of a public-private partnership project between CDOT, other public entities, and the BNSF and UP railroads."--P. 2., Includes bibliographical references., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover; (viewed August 2013), Project no. C SWOO-242.
Colorado Department of Transportation, DMJM-HARRIS, HDR., "May 18, 2005.", "To evaluate and validate the Project, a Public Benefits & Costs Study (the Study) was completed by DMJM+HARRIS and HDR (the Consultant team), in conjunction with CDOT. The purpose of this Study is to identify, and in some cases quantify, the potential public and private benefits and costs of relocating through-freight train infrastructure (bypass), and detail the advantages and disadvantages of a public-private partnership project between CDOT, other public entities, and the BNSF and UP railroads."--P. 2., Includes bibliographical references., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover; (viewed August 2013), Project no. C SWOO-242.
Colorado Department of Transportation, DMJM-HARRIS, HDR., "May 18, 2005.", "To evaluate and validate the Project, a Public Benefits & Costs Study (the Study) was completed by DMJM+HARRIS and HDR (the Consultant team), in conjunction with CDOT. The purpose of this Study is to identify, and in some cases quantify, the potential public and private benefits and costs of relocating through-freight train infrastructure (bypass), and detail the advantages and disadvantages of a public-private partnership project between CDOT, other public entities, and the BNSF and UP railroads."--P. 2., Includes bibliographical references., Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover; (viewed August 2013), Project no. C SWOO-242.
